Cultural Exploitation
In the book From Cultural Exchange to Transculturation: A Review and Reconceptualization of Cultural Appropriation, Richard Rogers refers to the appropriation of elements of a subordinated culture by a dominant culture without substantive reciprocity, permission, and/or compensation as Cultural Exploitation. In this scenario, the subordinated culture is treated like a resource for the dominate culture to consume/use for their own interests. It is still considered exploitation even when the appropriative acts indicate acceptance or appreciation because it nevertheless reinforces dominance and a “free for the taking” regard towards their cultural traditions. According to Rogers, cultural appropriation puts cultures at risk of degradation.
This can be seen in the case of the Washington Redskins, who continue to argue they're honoring a culture even though they disregard the protests of Native Americans who claim the name is problematic and offensive. It can also be seen by people who argue that wearing Native American headdresses recreationally is a form of honoring or appreciating it. If these people truly had appreciation or respect for a culture, they would not blatantly disregard cultural restrictions or the voices of the people who are telling them its not okay. |